There are at least two viewpoints upon the poetry inspiration: 1- inspiration is a phenomenon beyond the nature and outside the poet existence, 2- inspiration is a power originated from the poet unconscious self. Theorisians and poets have spoken a lot on these two theories to accept for and against them. As the human being MIND structures are not the same, naturally their treatments toward and conceptions about the same experience, be it objective or abstract, will be different. In other words, each poet, in special situation, understands the message more or less ambiguous. He does not know the origin of it. These new and to some extend ambiguous messages are mixed with the poets presuppositions in such a way that separation of “God given inspirations” or “MIND MADE ONES” is generally impossible. In this article tries to study this MIND complex procedure which was generally subject of a lot of poets and art theorists’ discussion.

The book "The Literary MIND" by Mark Turner, first published in 1996 at the Oxford Publishers Collection, was followed by numerous publications. The book, which has been considered and received by various experts from various branches of cognitive science, linguistics, literature, neurology, and philosophy, has come to light and deep in 208 pages and eight chapters on the subject of literary thought, and in particular the story and the parabolic story on the basis of language and thought. The author has shed light on the role and necessity of literature as a vital element. Despite the general opinion that the literary MIND is considered secondary and something special to of the experts of literature, in fact, the main theme of the book is that the activity of MIND is essentially literary. This book argues in a revolutionary way that the central theme of cognitive science is the nature of the literary MIND.

Is there beyond of our body the thing that does certain deed for us? This is a question that has a long antecedent in the history of science and philosophy. Spirit, soul, MIND, brain etc are answers that have been put to this question. As for, what is their nature? Is it a problem that has been always discussed?Nowadays, a part of philosophy that studies this problem is called "Philosophy of MIND". Although it is not really a new matter in philosophy, it has not a long time as a distinct part of philosophy. As for, what is stressing at present is the material statement of the discussed matter. The three theories of behaviorism, MIND- brain identity and functionalism are considerable in this area.This article is seeking to state these theories and criticize them.

I think; and my MIND turns what my thinking contains to the form of speech, to enable me communicate with others. According to Aristotle we can consider “MIND” as a mirror. However, there is a difference between MIND and a mirror. What is reflected in the mirror is the image of what is sensed, but the human MIND or consciousness is a reflection of not only the appearance but of all that passes through the sensory channels. And Science has two types: Learned and Intuitive, Knowledge of the world, (consciousness or awareness) and knowledge of self (self consciousness or self awareness, which according to Hosrel is impossible without general awareness. Heideger emphasizes on Existence or “Existing in” and believes it is experiencing being in the world that gives rise to knowledge. We also look at the ideas of Henry Bergson regarding MIND and try to synthesize these ideas into a connected image. Language on the other hand, is the most important and most complex means of human communication and an absolute necessity for human social life. It is a system of signs, which is anything that symbolizes something outside of or separate from itself. At last the relationship between “MIND” and “Language” is discussed. Was MIND older or as Chomsky points out, language? How do they relate to each other? These are the sample of questions that are put forward and the efforts that are MADE to answer these questions are discussed.

The relationship between man and architecture is usually assessed using behavioralscience. However, this research intended to study architecture as a cognitive componentusing 4E cognition. This is different from the effect of environment on cognition whichis often theorized as externalism within frameworks such as environmental psychology. This approach introduces architecture as an essential part of the MIND and cognition. The main research question was: how does architecture act as the causative componentof cognition? The main purpose of this study was to provide a new understanding of thenature of architecture and consequently, a new discourse to be established with architecture, particularly in the case of interactive and adaptive architectures which practically act as anextension of the body (prosthesis). At the strategic level, the research method was logicalargumentation which, at the level of measures, based the analysis of architecture, as theextensive MIND, on Merleau-Ponty’ s phenomenology of embodiment, as the external logicof the argument. This study answered the research question by proving the essential roleof metaphor in embodied cognition and consciousness and then, the role of architecturein generating primary and mixed metaphors. Therefore, here, metaphor is not considereda literary device but the foundation of abstract concepts and is strongly dependent on thecharacteristics of the body of the agent and the function of the body within the environment. The results of this study showed that architecture, as a body, acts as part of the extendedMIND or as an Exogram and architecture, as space, is the creator, weight-giver, and changerof primary metaphors by means of our sensory-motor behaviors and thus acts as an extensiveand integrated MIND.